Skip to main content.

Thursday, September 03, 2009


By Michael Matza
The Philadelphia Inquirer (MCT)

PHILADELPHIA — The U.S. State Department is looking for ways to better protect the 30,000 teenagers who come to America annually as foreign exchange students.

In a notice Wednesday in the Federal Register, the department asked the public to contribute ideas on how it could better vet, select and monitor the thousands of host families that participate in the half-century-old federal program.

The goal: to prevent a repeat of a scandal this past spring in Scranton, Pa., where as many as a dozen foreign students were found to be either malnourished or living in deplorable conditions, including one home littered with dog feces and another later condemned by the city.

Current regulations allow the approximately 100 U.S. companies that bring students here to independently evaluate the financial resources, moral character and suitability of potential hosts.

A lack of definitive "industry standards," however, is "putting at risk the health, safety and welfare of this most vulnerable group of exchange visitors," the department wrote in its announcement of a 30-day comment period.

Sen. Bob Casey, D.-Pa., said this week that new regulations were urgently needed to close loopholes that allow exchange companies to virtually regulate themselves, thus jeopardizing the safety of the students, ages 15 to 18.

As both a Scranton native and a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, which oversees the State Department, Casey has closely monitored the federal response to the problems in Scranton. In May, he raised his concerns about lax oversight in a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton.

"The current oversight system is reactive, not proactive, and permits the ongoing abuse of foreign students without any effective intervention until the situation is dire," he wrote.

In an interview Tuesday, Casey said "the department has to do a better job. The families have a right to expect that, and our taxpayers have a right to expect it. ... Department regulations need to be strengthened so these neglect-and-abuse issues don't have to wait eight months to be addressed," as happened in Scranton.

Among many issues, the department is seeking public input on how to:
—Evaluate hosts' character references and conduct criminal background checks.
—Monitor host homes for sanitary conditions.
—Ensure families have adequate financial resources to care for foreign students.

The department also is considering requiring a host to have, at a minimum, one other school-age child in the home because "problematic placements" often occur in childless homes.

In a request to the Office of Management and Budget earlier this year, the department asked permission to create its own management-audit system to monitor the exchange companies. Currently, the auditing falls to an exchange industry association, which critics say is a patent conflict of interest.

That association is the Council on Standards for International Educational Travel, an Alexandria, Va., nonprofit. Its executive director, John Hishmeh, said he welcomed yesterday's action as "an opportunity for the youth exchange community and the State Department to work together."

The Scranton exchange students had to be moved to the care of Lackawanna County's Department of Human Services last spring after they complained, over a period of months, of living in unacceptable conditions.

A Colombian boy, barred from eating food in the host's refrigerator, was undernourished and dehydrated. A Nigerian girl lived in a house strewed with dog feces. One student was housed with a person convicted of a drug-related felony, according to Lackawanna County District Attorney Anthony Jarbola.

In July, a county grand jury issued a five-count indictment for child neglect against the former area coordinator for the California company that brought the students to America.

In June, the State Department imposed sanctions that allowed the company, Aspect Foundation, to continue operating but with a 15 percent reduction in the number of students it could enroll for the 2009-2010 academic year.

The federal foreign exchange program, created during the Eisenhower administration, is a "public diplomacy" initiative designed to promote America's image abroad.

"Although complaints about inappropriate placement or actual mistreatment ... represent the exception rather than the rule, there have been a sufficient number of incidents of such severity" that the regulations need to be honed, the department said in its announcement.

Advocates for exchange students say there are problems nationwide, but the Scranton cases have been a catalyst.

"It was very powerful for the public to learn ... that the State Department was allowing its sponsors to self-investigate," said Danielle Grijalva of the Committee for Safety of Foreign Exchange Students, a nonprofit watchdog group she founded in San Diego. "That has been a concern of ours for years, but it was uncovered in Pennsylvania."

Casey said he would keep pushing if it turned out that any new regulations were not strong enough to bring needed changes.

"If we think the steps they have taken are inadequate," he said, "we will impose legislation."

(c) 2009, The Philadelphia Inquirer.
Visit Philadelphia Online, the Inquirer's World Wide Web site, at http://www.philly.com/
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

Comments

If you knew how "married" the State Department and the exchange industry really are, you would understand that when John Hishmeh stated that he welcomed yesterday's action as "an opportunity for the youth exchange community and the State Department to work together," he was doing so with a big wink to the State Department's Educational and Cultural Division staff. That is the problem! They are already working too closely. That is why complaints about abuse to this department haven't gone anywhere over the years. This oversight department needs a thorough cleaning, from Stanley Colvin on down. Replace them with people who are truly interested in protecting these studetns, not the wealthy exchange agencies. The best way we can protect these high school students right now is to reduce the number of students who are brought over here each year. These agencies repeatedly bring over kids that don't have a school or home placment to go to once they get here. Once the agency gets their $12000 - 20,000 for each student, they don't care what happens to them. Do we need more regulations? Yes. But what we equally need is a strong oversight department that doesn't fold to industry lobbyists. This restructured department should include at least one strong citizen child/consumer advocate.

Posted by Jan at Sunday, September 20, 2009 05:05:54

The U.S. Department of State is stalling the implementation of fingerprint criminal checks for another year. On June 3, 2010, the proposed regulations closed for public comment for the THIRD time. Host families are duped by the exchange industry to oppose fingerprint criminal checks recommended by the Nat'l Center for Missing and Exploited Children.More foreign teenagers will face the danger of being placed with convicted sex predators.

Posted by Mary at Sunday, June 06, 2010 17:23:00

AGAIN!! The U.S. Department of State in a big hurry posted on June 2, 2010 another public forum for June 17, 2010 just for the exchange industry. Millions and millions in revenue PLUS State Department free grants has the exchange industry opposing fingerprint checks and it demanded and GOT its public input meeting.Fingerprint checks are necessary to keep foreign teenagers from being hosted by sexual predators.

Posted by Mary at Friday, June 11, 2010 13:01:28

Add Comment

:

:
: